Search for: "State v. A. H."
Results 381 - 400
of 10,724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 6:35 am
” By clearly stating that H&K is representing “you” – in this case, plaintiff – the document can reasonably create the impression that H&K was first and foremost representing plaintiff’s interests. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:41 pm
See Mariner LDC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
H/t: JQB. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:25 am
From Mahmood v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:28 pm
[1] Abraham H. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of Lockwood v County of Suffolk 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 Decided on August 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of Lockwood v County of Suffolk 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 Decided on August 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Michael Luttig and the renowned more liberal leaning Harvard constitutional law expert Laurence H. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
From yesterday's decision in Ohio v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:21 pm
The case is Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
R-H Int’l, Ltd., 1987 WL 33980, at *4 (Del. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
A separate bill would eliminate the authority of the SEC to regulate shareholder proposals in their entirety, mirroring the objective of an ongoing lawsuit intervention by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in National Center for Public Policy Research v. [read post]