Search for: "State v. Adams " Results 381 - 400 of 3,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  (See Hale, supra, 183 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1383-1384; see generally Adams v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Over at the Times, Adam Liptak has a fun piece on the attendance of the Supremes at the State of the Union address — sitting in their robes, trying to look normal, or at least not miserable, as political statements are hurled every which way. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Caroline Ncube
The first issue of South African Intellectual Property Law Journal (IPLJ) edited by Lee-Ann Tong and Caroline Ncube (this Leo) is now in print.The IPLJ strives to be the journal of choice for academics, practitioners and students of IP law. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner’s October 19th post on Sir Scott Baker’s Extradition Review Panel report  noted that the document “mostly backed the status quo,” calling attention to its rejection of proposed reforms to the  “forum bar” rule, the US/UK Treaty, and the lack of a  prima facie case requirement. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:20 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing yesterday entitled “The Administrative State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Word from George Burton Adams, via Samuel Bray, Notre Dame Law (Volokh Conspiracy). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
 ;   I wish particularly to support Rimer LJ’s criticism of the dicta in Nicholas and his view that these cannot be relied upon as a correct statement of the law following the decision of this court in Adams v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by Richard Goldfarb
Douglas Adams died in 2001, eons too early at the age of 49, but I am fairly certain he would have given a rueful chuckle to the case of Pardini v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
The NYT‘s Adam Liptak has a very interesting story about how some facts make their way into Supreme Court opinions. [read post]