Search for: "State v. Alles" Results 381 - 400 of 127,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] No Sealing of Documents in Lawsuit Alleging Prison Nurse's Falling Asleep Contributed to Inmate's Death
17 Jun 2024, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
From Thursday's decision by Judge David Larimer in Carey v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] $47K Sanctions for "Filing … Election Challenge Without Substantial Justification" in Arizona
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Is Promotion of Free Services "Commercial Speech" for First Amendment Purposes?
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Judge Roy Altman leads by example (with unrelated updated)
17 Jun 2024, 10:03 am by David Oscar Markus
United States: In order to get work, the defendant used as a front a company that qualified as a “disadvantaged business enterprise,” though the company performed no actual work. [read post]
Southern District of Florida Blog - http://sdfla.blogspot.com/
Democracy on Trial: Chestek and the Future of USPTO Accountability
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am by Dennis Crouch
State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Recent New Jersey Supreme Court Decision Outlines Confrontation Clause Fundamentals
17 Jun 2024, 7:59 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  In State v. [read post]
New Jersey Criminal Defense Attorney Blog - http://www.newjerseycriminaldefenseattorney-blog.com/
On the duty to inform another party of the fact that the other party inadvertently disclosed documents... and more
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  But nothing else is, and the incident raises a number of interesting question not addressed by the court.First of all, why does the court refer to the documents as privileged? [read post]
Professional Responsibility Blog - https://bernabepr.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court adds four cases to next term’s docket
17 Jun 2024, 7:49 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
State v. Heath: Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies Criminal Discovery in Texas
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
The State v. [read post]
Versus Texas Criminal Defense Blog - https://www.versustexas.com/blog/
State v. Heath: Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies Criminal Discovery in Texas
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
The State v. [read post]
Personal Injury Law Blog - https://versusinjury.com/blog/
State v. Heath: Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies Criminal Discovery in Texas
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
The State v. [read post]
Divorce and Family Law Blog - https://familytexas.com/news/
Unjust Enrichment In An Illinois Divorce
17 Jun 2024, 4:31 am by Russell Knight
” Peddinghaus v. [read post]
Law Offices of Russell D. Knight - https://rdklegal.com/blog/
Court of Appeals Bolsters the Internal Affairs Doctrine, Takes a Stroll Through Scottish Fiduciary Law
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
New York Business Divorce - http://www.nybusinessdivorce.com/
A Rejoinder to Dr Cosmas Emeziem’s “Conflict of Laws and Diversity of Opinions—A View of The Nigerian Jurisdiction”
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
For instance, Lord Collins a former non-permanent Member of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, delivered the leading judgment in the significant cross-border matter of Ryder Industries Ltd v Chan Shui Woo, with the agreement of all other judges on the panel. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
Cleary Gottlieb Discusses the Context for Analyzing Force Majeure Clauses in the UK
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
Supreme Court “Bump Stock” Case Reveals the Limits of Statutory Interpretation
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Dubai Supreme Court — Again — on the Enforcement of Canadian (Ontario) Enforcement Judgment
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without… [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
[Stephen Halbrook] Second Amendment Roundup: Bump Stocks are not Machineguns
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Rybar (3th Cir. 1996), he wrote: Was United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/