Search for: "State v. Beach"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2020, 5:53 am
An example of this occurred in the case of Data Payment Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am
Full Disclosure: I like the beach. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:33 pm
Adkins, SC11-1878 (constitutionality of section 893.13), and State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:34 am
Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:29 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
" (ellipsis in original) (quoting United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:03 pm
In a recent case, NATALIE NICHOLS, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:27 am
The recent case of Carter v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:52 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:09 pm
As we wrote last week, the case arose in the context of a program carried out by the state of Florida in which sand was pumped onto beaches to combat erosion and to protect ocean-front property. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:32 am
Damages in condemnation cases State of Texas v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
Brown left the beach area in LaPorte.Mr. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
Gore: Haste Makes MistakesErwin ChemerinskyChapter 12 Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:54 am
In a previous post, I noted that, pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court case of Dennis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:25 am
Requiring a lifeguard applicant to take a swim test using a State issued “Speedo” swimsuit is not an act of unlawful discrimination because of ageMatter of Lester v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 60 AD3d 680The New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Roy J. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
[Long Beach Unit], 8 NY3d 465Article V, Section 6 of New York State’s Constitution mandates that appointments and promotions in the civil service of the State and its political subdivisions "shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive. [read post]
