Search for: "State v. Beers" Results 381 - 400 of 1,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2017, 3:21 am
In Bay State Brewing, it rejected such an agreement in a case involving two marks for beer because the agreement did not "fully contemplate all reasonable circumstances in which the marks may be used by consumers calling for the goods. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
The case is Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
While driving home from that house after consuming four beers, he was involved in the accident that severely injured the individual. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  WANKER allowed for beer, rejected for clothing. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
In the whimsically captioned Cupcake & Boomboom, LLC v Aslani, 2016 NY Slip Op 32310(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 22, 2016], the outcome was anything but whimsical for the defendant. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm by Daniel Nazer
Today, together with the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Freedom of Expression, EFF submitted an amicus brief in Lee v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:10 pm by Jon Katz
The officer first stated that his report did make such an allegation. [read post]