Search for: "State v. Bird" Results 381 - 400 of 1,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm by LundgrenJohnson
  And, the question of whether an officer must provide a driver the opportunity to speak with counsel, even when requesting a test outside of Minnesota’s Implied Consent statutory scheme that carries various civil penalties, is currently under review by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
talks, in turn, about director's moral rights.Weekly Roundups: Saturday Sundries[Week ending 19 November]Birss J in Accord v Research Corporation Technologies attempts to cut the red tape on the right to claim priorityThe AmeriKat Annsley invites Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) to report on the recent decision of Birss J in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 addressing the issue of patent priority date. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
  Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) reports on a recent decision of Mr Justice Birss in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 on the issue. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
No licence is therefore given to the copier, even if the TOS state terms that might indicate as such. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 7:58 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec, et al., v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
No, the DeVOL is in the detailKatfriend Darren Meale provides an analysis of a recent decision relating to UK unregistered design rights (UKUDR): Neptune v DeVOL Kitchens [2017] EWHC 2172. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm by Larry
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
High profile cases in the United States and Canada include the 2011 claim against Warner Bros. [read post]