Search for: "State v. Board of Valuation"
Results 381 - 400
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court decided a case titled KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:00 am
The corporation submitted its counsel's opposing affirmation (read here) stating that "any events subsequent to the valuation date are irrelevant" and that "[a]s of the valuation date . . . [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
In Zapata v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
With regard to stock options, the most significant change occurred in 1992 with the requirement that stock options be valued at date of grant based on (a) the potential realizable value if stock were to appreciate by certain specified percentages or (b) Black-Scholes or other acceptable model of option valuation. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
In London v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:06 am
Vice v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(Michael Geist) Copyright Board’s legal history making (Jeremy de Beer) China China’s stunning lack of brands (China Law Blog) How much does a copyright holder get when his content is broadcast in China? [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am
In that case the Board of Tax Appeals states: "The General Assembly has mandated the exemption period begin in the year in which the order is issued. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
Issues: Whether the State Board of Equalization erred in determining that ExxonMobil's Black Canyon facility is an "initial dehydrator" for point of valuation purposes under Wyo. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China's grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP) Brussels Court of… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion… [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:12 pm
On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court concluded that Kahn v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
This principle is vividly on display in a recently decided case called Ambar v. [read post]
