Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 381 - 400 of 13,653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Andy Biggs (R-AZ) and Pat Fallon (R-TX), has proposed impeaching Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for his role in carrying out Biden’s immigration policies. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 7:48 am by Russell Knight
R. 206(c)(1) Every topic should have a final, ideal question that the other questions lead to. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v Wong, 2012 ONCA 432, indicated that this definition equally applies to s. 95 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:53 am by Michael Oykhman
R v Papalia stated that causing bodily harm to the victim is not an essential element of the offence of sexual assault with a weapon. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am by Michael Oykhman
Use A key consideration when establishing “use” of a credit card is established in a case called R v Tuduce, 2014 ONCA 547 (CanLII). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:22 am by Michael Oykhman
Similar to section 270(1)(b), section 270(c)(ii) requires proof of an assault and then also proof of intent to “rescue anything taken under lawful process, distress or seizure”. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
(c) In the case of an invention made by an AI machine, is the owner, creator and user of that AI machine entitled to the grant of a patent for that invention? [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
Regarding the CJEU decision in Audi v OHIM C‑398/08,  the GC noted that the factual context of the case was substantially different, since the slogan “Vorsprung durch Technik” was considered renowned and had been used for many years by Audi to promote the sale of its motor vehicles in class 12. [read post]