Search for: "State v. Captain"
Results 381 - 400
of 971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2006, 2:42 am
But the court of appeals held that the trial court erred in not enforcing the parties' contract, stating that the trial court was charged with enforcing the parties' agreement, not construing their clearly stated contract. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Beer had stated in cross-examination that “there was obviously an agenda” in relation to allegations of corruption. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
(As the Captain points out, the email is an old one, but Bob Norman has it up on his Daily Pulp and the JAA blog had a link to it as well, so why should we be left out of the fun and frivolity just because we live in Dade?) [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
” Brief of Petitioner at 19, Al Bahlul v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court's decision, please use this link: Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 8:13 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument on February 28, 2008 in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:56 am
See Jauch v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:12 pm
USA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:26 pm
State of Florida found at No. 4D11-3314 decided on May 31, 2016. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
KA v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
Captain Robert Johnson, piloting the M/V Strandja, ordered a maneuver that allegedly led to a collision with the Bailey’s barge, resulting in damage to both vessels. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
Lord Woolf CJ controversially stated: “A public figure is entitled to a private life. [read post]
Argument preview: Determining the statute of limitations for military rape — and possibly a lot more
16 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
” When the Supreme Court entertains argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:53 am
On Tuesday, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:07 am
On June 6, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit handed down its decision in Jarvis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:43 am
Consider Russo v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
* There must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant to §§80 or 80-a (1976 Opinions of the Attorney General 7; see, also, O'Reilly v Nedelka, 212 A.D.2d 714). ** CSL §80 controls with respect to the rights of employees in the competitive class in the event of a layoff; §80-a controls with respect to employees in State service in positions in the non-competitive… [read post]
