Search for: "State v. Connors" Results 381 - 400 of 2,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm by Elizabeth B. Carpenter
(O’Connor, J) Justice O’Connor wrote to agree that the rule announced does not apply retroactively. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
 She had a strategic plan, modeled on how Thurgood Marshall went after racial discrimination leading to Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Sean Wajert
Readers may recall from our earlier posts that Nicastro resulted in a plurality opinion which tracked Justice O'Connor's plurality opinion in Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm by Steven Hansen
As it turns out this Connors case below was not heard by the California or US Supreme Court.Essentially the court opinion below upheld the 1959 California Superme Court decision Cosper v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:59 am
Louis Post Dispatch reports on yesterday's oral arguments in the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:39 am
  Everyone from Sonia Sotomayor to Sandra Day O'Connor is confessing a deep love for the series. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, here’s an excerpt from Justice O’Connor’s plurality opinion:The Fourteenth Amendment provides that no State shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am by Mark Bennett
In the relevant portion of Teague (parts IV and V, in which only four justices—O’Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Kennedy—joined), Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:47 am
Friday's DJ had two obits of note: Sandra Day O'Connor, 1930-2023 ["In California, where O’Connor began her legal career, the profession and the judiciary is even more diverse than it is nationally. [read post]