Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
South Africa is the first Member State that has adopted a customised version of the WIPO manual on this topic. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Morley & Ors v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:58 pm
Supreme Court in recent years: the ruling on the constitutionality of the health-care law that is arguably the crowning achievement of President Obama’s first term in office. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am
Background On the 20 October 2010, Ms Mitchell was convicted of murder in the Crown Court at Belfast. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:56 am
Tomorrow in Kurns v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:25 am
United States, WL 2368661 (2012) (Scalia, J. dissenting) (citing and quoting Hinderlider v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:02 am
Criticizing Comprehensive Drug Testing, posted here, is United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
Matthew Barnes of 1 Crown Office Row represented the secretary of state in this case. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm
In Brnovich v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:22 am
(The case is B.C. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am
Varnum When the Iowa Supreme Court decided the Varnum v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
In the course of their interviews, they each made statements which were later relied on by the Crown at their trials. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 7:57 am
On 2 June 2021, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) updated its guidance on prosecuting failure to report cases under s330 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:30 am
Tut v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v Secretary of… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:25 pm
An alleged defect in a Lincoln Town Car killed a man and badly injured a woman in Jablonski v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Public.Resource.Org that dealt with eligibility of copyright protection, stating that the non-authoritative status of annotations indicated that the creation of the annotations would fall outside of legislative duties.And even more recently, she authored the long-awaited decision regarding the "Booking.com" service mark, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
