Search for: "State v. Dam" Results 381 - 400 of 555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 11:47 am by charley foster
State of Montana… The decision … makes clear that States are not free to start charging the owners of dams and reservoirs, or other water-based facilities, millions of dollars of ‘rent’ based on novel and sweeping claims of riverbed ownership. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by SJM
Firstly the State sought to argue that as nobody had lost their life, Art 2 was not engaged. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:08 pm by Darren O'Donovan
In the main case in the area, Hungary v Slovakia, an agreement to build a dam agreed between the two countries made during the terms of Cold War era governments was held to still bind their democratic, successor governments. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
Brown, holding that states may not carve specific classes of claims out of the Federal Arbitration Act; PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:49 pm by Matt DeVries
In the case, the Montana Supreme Court held that the state of Montana owns and may charge for use of riverbeds where privately owned hydro-electric dams were located. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by WIMS
" In its concluding statement on the case the Justices said, "As the litigation history of this case shows, Montana filed its claim for riverbed rent over a century after the first of the dams was built upon the riverbeds. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
"     In its concluding statement on the case the Justices said, "As the litigation history of this case shows, Montana filed its claim for riverbed rent over a century after the first of the dams was built upon the riverbeds. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:17 pm by rtruman
High Court, 9-0, Rules Against State on Navigable Waters and Rent for Dams :: PPL Montana v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:02 pm by Maureen Cosgrove
PPL Montana (PPL) [corporate website], which owns a hydroelectric power dam on the Missouri River, brought the challenge after the state Supreme Court held [opinion, PDF] that the title to the riverbeds passed to Montana when... [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Latin American and Caribbean activists have brought cases to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the first case of sexual orientation discrimination, Atala v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post, we had provided a descriptive comment of the decision of the Supreme Court in MP Rural Road Development Authority v. [read post]