Search for: "State v. Duty" Results 381 - 400 of 31,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:23 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Canada Post Corp v Canadian Union of Postal Workers, 2019 SCC 67 (“Canada Post”), the Supreme Court of Canada (“Court”) limited federally regulated employers’ duty to conduct safety inspections. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:46 am
Regina v Evans (Gemma) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “For the purposes of gross negligence manslaughter, when a person had created or contributed to the creation of a state of affairs which he knew, or ought to have known had become life-threatening to another person, a consequent duty would normally arise on him to act by taking [...] [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:30 am by Ashley Smith
Judge Hurley of the United States Southern District Court of Florida recently set out what may be the most extensive statement of an insurance broker’s duty under Florida law.1 In Tiara Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
Alternatively, each state may come to its own conclusion about whether this duty applies and in which situations. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The court found no error in giving an instruction that stated a manufacturer’s duty was a non-delegable duty and that it could not rely on others to issue an adequate warning. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:03 am by sally
Ali and another v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] WLR (D) 86 “A local housing authority’s duty, under section 193 of the Housing Act 1996, to secure that accommodation be made available for an unintentionally homeless person who had a priority need did not give the homeless person a ‘civil right’ within the meaning of art 6(1) of the European Convention for the… [read post]