Search for: "State v. E. W. B." Results 381 - 400 of 2,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2021, 7:57 am by Eugene Volokh
"[W]e do not hesitate to construe" a statute punishing threats "to require … intent" to threaten. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
Breaking Media, Inc.: [W]e conclude that the district court did not err when it granted the Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss based on the application of the Massachusetts fair report privilege and First Amendment principles. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
As of 2021, the tax is no longer levied.[10] 2021 State Income Tax Rates and Brackets State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2021   Single Filer Married Filing Jointly Standard Deduction Personal Exemption State Rates   Brackets Rates   Brackets Single Couple Single Couple Dependent Alabama (a, b, c) 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,500 $7,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,000   4.00% > $500 4.00% > $1,000        … [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:45 am by Russell Knight
“The word “documents,” as used in Part E of Article II, includes, but is not limited to, papers, photographs, films, recordings, memoranda, books, records, accounts, communications and electronically stored information as defined in Rule 201(b)(4). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 5:36 am by Ralf Michaels
Climate protection and compliance in German corporate law (Habersack/Ehrl) W. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
The court noted that the statute’s distinction between one strike defendants and those convicted of intentional first degree murder appeared inconsistent with United States Supreme Court constitutional jurisprudence: “[W]e note defendants’ contention that the current treatment of juvenile One Strike offenders is anomalous given that juveniles convicted of special circumstance murder and sentenced to LWOP5 are now eligible for parole during their 25th year… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So even if the majority were right that requiring appellants to appeal a Rule 50 motion is more "desirable" than permitting parties to appeal a denial of summary judgment after trial where the purported error is one of law, "[w]e cannot steer around binding precedent even were we not to agree with it. [read post]