Search for: "State v. GC"
Results 381 - 400
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
To substantiate the proposition that “in any case” must be construed widely, the Delhi High Court cited the judgment in Lalu Prasad Yadav v State of Bihar, where the Supreme Court did indeed observe that “in any case” means “in all cases”. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Exchange Comm. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am
Spar Shipping as v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company Ltd, [2015] EWHC 718 (Comm). 2. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Supreme Court* Federal Appellate Court Decisions* State Roundup* Topical* Articles/Reports/Books* Foreign SpotlightTo begin, scan the link descriptions below and click.U.S. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:45 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Tom states: If you think that a secret is something you tell one person at a time, you’re in the wrong job. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 4:44 am
This policy was based on Peranzo et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
There has been significant commentary and conjecture over the decision in R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor (see our post or read the judgment). [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:27 am
GOBERT AND GC SCHOOLS! [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am
Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, paras. 160-65, ECHR 2005? [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
