Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 381 - 400
of 5,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2017, 11:41 am
Heller in the Supreme Court was Parker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Good Lord! [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
[this fits with the Court's ruling in Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex, noted by the IPKat here] (2), (3) and (4) The trade mark proprietor is entitled to oppose further commercialisation of the unboxed products within the meaning of Article 7(2) of Directive 89/104 and Article 13(2) of Regulation No 40/94 where the outer packaging have been removed from perfumes and cosmetics without the consent of the trade mark proprietor if, as a result of the removal of the outer… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:48 am
See Mitchell v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm
This Act was challenged in 1939 in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption stated, “A system designed to prevent double taxation on the consideration for goods has been exploited so as to prevent any taxation on the consideration at all. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:18 pm
However, imagine that the legislature has determined that exempting food from the sales tax is not good tax policy, that it is no longer affordable by the state, or that the products manufactured by food companies should bear the same tax burden as all other manufactured products. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
The defendant obtained the products bearing the copyright from a third party who legally purchased them outside the United States. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am
Robbery, defined to be the felonious and forcible taking from the person of another of goods or money, by violence or by putting the person in fear. 11. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Runyon v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:17 am
Tommie Copper IP, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
The Omega watches bear a copyrighted globe design on the underside of the watch. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
United States. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
See State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
