Search for: "State v. Greenfield"
Results 381 - 399
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 9:08 am
State. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
They know damn well that the working-poor accused who makes bail, if he is forced to hire counsel, is going to have no choice but to hire a criminal pretender.The solution is obvious: offer appointed counsel to the working poor, conditioned on their reimbursing the state as much as they can (that is, paying the state what they would otherwise pay criminal pretense lawyers).Technorati Tags: courts, criminal defense, criminal pretense [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:41 am
State (pdf) upheld the trial court's reasonable doubt definition, which was, according to the trial court, "a slight variation of the charge on reasonable dobut recommended by Justice Ginsburg . . . in Victor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The decision is here: Barnes v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 7:18 am
Gideon at a public defender reports on State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 9:46 am
Further, this is a deliberate attempt to circumvent existing law, like the one rejected by the Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:37 pm
State);2. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
I wrote about the California Supreme Court's decision in The Oakland Raiders v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:34 am
If anyone else has ever seen such a thing from a state's highest court, I'd love to hear about it.The decision is reproduced in full below (Scott Greenfield, loved the caption, People v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
The claim in Watson v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
But one state judge held in September 2006 that it was unconstitutional, asserting in Graham v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:22 am
V. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
United States [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
But, sure enough, there's actually a decision from our state's highest court, refusing to characterize the sale of outdated merchandise as a "deceptive or misleading" business practice.In Matter of Food Parade, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2004, 11:07 am
We posted on Elwood v. [read post]
