Search for: "State v. H. K. D. S." Results 381 - 400 of 718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
(d) The request for correction must be filed without delay.(...)5.7 However, the Board is of the opinion that criterion d) is not fulfilled. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Term ‘patent troll’ is ‘commonly used and understood in patent litigation’ and need not be stricken from pleadings: Highland Plastics v Sorenson Research & Development (Docket Report) (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Situs of material events in false marking cases is where marking occurred: Simonian v Maybelline (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) ITC terminates… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Here, the SEC instituted proceedings against Tilton and her Patriarch Partners firms in March of 2015, alleging that she and her firms hid the poor performance of the companies that she’d invested in. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
  [20]  A study of the effectiveness of the R&D Credit has shown a positive impact on R&D activity and “[t]here is significant evidence that nations and states that adopt an R&D tax credit will experience an increase in R&D investments. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
However, upon withdrawal, the traditional 401(k) would be taxed 20 percent, or $800, and drop in value to the same $3,200 as the Roth 401(k). [read post]