Search for: "State v. Harm" Results 381 - 400 of 25,781
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Natalia Kubesch
None of them have been delivered to survivors of the conflict in Syria to compensate them for the harm suffered at the hands of the Syrian regime. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:59 am by Allan Blutstein
Although the Circuit stated in passing that the foreseeable harm requirement applied to “all exemptions, except Exemption 3,” a more recent district court opinion correctly pointed out that foreseeable harm would “always” be present when the government properly invokes Exemption 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by Will Baude
I wrote back: "It is not clear whether the Supreme Court's ruling that a harm to MOHELA is necessarily a harm to Missouri also means that MOHELA is the same as the state for other legal purposes," and a paraphrase of my comment was added to the story. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
The orthodox U.S. constitutional response to harmful speech, including false speech, is counterspeech. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Nebraska (2023), the Court recognized that MOHELA is a government entity; there, it did so for the purpose of deciding whether a harm to MOHELA is a harm to the state, but the logic extends equally to other constitutional contexts. [read post]