Search for: "State v. Hawkins"
Results 381 - 400
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
(Acevedo v Holton, 239 AD2d 194 [1st Dept 1997]; Uptodate Medical Services, P.C. v State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:02 am
The case was not similar to Hawkins v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Cole v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Hawkins (1996) Prior judicial proceedings are also subject to the necessity and reliability principles. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
The rehearing petition in Hawkins v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:34 am
The 9th (Reinhardt with Schroeder, Pregerson, Kozinski, Hawkins, S. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
The five dissenting judges argued that this “evidentiary privilege” — traced to the Supreme Court’s 1953 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:49 am
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So. 2d 1301 (Ala. 1984); Hawkins v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:49 pm
Judge Hawkins punctuates his point by citing Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:50 pm
Woolen, Brown & Hawkins, 15 Ill. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Principal Hawkins corroborated Coach Anderson's testimony, stating that, based on his knowledge of Oliver as a former student, the principal would not have expected Oliver to carry out his threat. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
Principal Hawkins corroborated Coach Anderson's testimony, stating that, based on his knowledge of Oliver as a former student, the principal would not have expected Oliver to carry out his threat. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
” United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:33 am
Hawkins, appointed to the bench by Republican Gov. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
