Search for: "State v. Hodge"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
EEOC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The third case, EEOC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
In Washington v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Second, the Court’s ruling treated Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
The court cited Hodges, Grant & Kaufman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
The court cited Hodges, Grant & Kaufman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
Hodges, 515 F.2d 650, 653 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:44 am
Hodges put an end to marriage inequality, making the loving agreement legal in all 50 states. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Lord Hodge concludes that the approach of Lord Briggs provides for more satisfactory protection for the holder of a purpose-limited patent. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Particularly, Lord Sumption, together with Lord Reed, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs, found that if claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed, but differed in their reasons. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Hodges v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Hodges v. [read post]
