Search for: "State v. J. D. B." Results 381 - 400 of 3,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Thirdly, clauses 4(3)(b) & (d) would relieve courts of the cl.4(1) obligation to give great weight to the importance of freedom of speech in cases relating to alleged breaches of confidence where the duty of confidentiality was said to arise from a contract – including, it would seem, in the employment context, non-disclosure agreements (‘NDAs’), which have been criticised as being against the public interest (see ABC v Telegraph Group Ltd [2019] EMLR… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am by Eugene Volokh
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kaufman v Boies Schiller Flexner LLP2022 NY Slip Op 32743(U)  August 15, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 154149/2018  Judge: James d’Auguste is the very fraught story of a massively fought matrimonial action. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Trade Comm’n, Equifax to Pay $575 Million as Part of Settlement with FTC, CFPB, and States Related to 2017 Data Breach (July 22, 2019), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press- releases/2019/07/equifax-pay-575-million-part-settlement-ftc-cfpb-states-related-2017-data-breach. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Ashley Morgan
Law Enforcement Has Initiated Medicare Audits of Amniotic Liquid / Amniotic Tissue / Skin Substitute / Wound Care Claims: UPIC Audits of Original Medicare Part B Amniotic Tissue / Skin Substitute / Wound Care Claims. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Relying on the constitutionally protected right to liberty, American courts have elevated the integrity of the family unit and parental rights to the status of constitutional values: see the discussion on this issue in the dissenting reasons of LaForest J in B(R) v Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, 1995 CanLII 115 (SCC), [1995] 1 SCR 315 at 369-370, 122 DLR (4th) 1. [read post]
§ 314(d) precludes judicial review of the agency’s application of Section 315(b)’s time bar. [read post]