Search for: "State v. James B. Williams" Results 381 - 400 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
North Carolina, a case I’ve been following closely — my students Jeremy Page, Mike Romeo and Sydney Sherman, and I filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the petition for Supreme Court review, filed on behalf of professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and… [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Ohio State University)Kahn Matthew (UCLA)Kaplan Ethan (Stockholm University)Karolyi, Andrew (Ohio State University)Kashyap Anil (University of Chicago)Keim Donald B (University of Pennsylvania)Ketkar Suhas L (Vanderbilt University)Kiesling Lynne (Northwestern University)Klenow Pete (Stanford University)Koch Paul (University of Kansas)Kocherlakota Narayana (University of Minnesota)Koijen Ralph S.J. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm by Sophia Z. Lee
The first constitutional challenge to union fees was brought seventy years ago by Cecil B. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Co., 16 N.J. 180, 185 (1954) (slip onsmooth stairway in railroad station).Williams v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  But one explanation for populism, obviously, is a justified belief that governmental institutions have been captured by elites who fit James Madison’s notion of a “faction,” i.e., representatives of distinctly partial interests rather than people genuinely committed to something that might be termed “the public interest. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Newson, No. 06-41115 "A defendant is not entitled to a decrease under U.S.S.G. section 3E1.1(b) unless the Government files a motion requesting the adjustment. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]