Search for: "State v. Jeremy D."
Results 381 - 400
of 431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge) US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:11 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 3:24 am
The car v the tank We’d all like to shoot Jeremy Clarkson with a tank. 4. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 4:54 pm
State of Indiana , a 13-page pinion, Judge Vaidik writes:Following a jury trial, Jeremy W. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Liptak and Jeremy M. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
On the other hand, the recent finding in Virginia (in its Supreme Court, second time around) that the state’s anti-spam law was unconstitutional (in the case of exceptionally commercial spammer Jeremy Jaynes) and the broader debate on spam and the First Amendment is of some comparative interest and does indicate that the matter, at least as far as US law is concerned, is not settled. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
Everybody's a critic.We published a post last month analyzing Gunvalson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:45 pm
See Dudnikov v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (7): Jeremy J. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:41 pm
Jeremy Pitcock: Complaint (PDF) [Supreme Court of the State of New York] Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Jeremy Pitcock (scroll down) [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:38 am
The first was GVR'd in light of State Farm, the second granted, and now this one. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision: (Gowlings), … [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
As the US Supreme court explained in Broadrick v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:41 am
The Court of Appeals reversed in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jeremy A. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
Provisions of the Bill were incorporated against the states with ridiculous casualness in cases like Gitlow and Cantwell v CT. [read post]
