Search for: "State v. Kelly" Results 381 - 400 of 2,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 8:30 am
Congress did not in the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 confer on FERC federal "backstop" authority to overrule timely state decisions denying applications to site and construct proposed interstate transmission lines, a divided (2-1) panel of a U.S. appeals court ruled February 18 in the much-anticipated case of Piedmont Environmental Council v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 9:30 am
The oral argument held before the Supreme Court Thursday in the case of Darryl Jeter v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:23 pm
Judge Kelly is so far the only jurist in state or federal court since United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, rearg denied 96 NY2d 854, the Appellate Division concluded that the penalty imposed, termination, was not "so disproportionate to the offense[s] as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" and thus did not constitute an abuse of discretion and dismissed Tamsen’s appeal.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00785.htm _______________________The Discipline Book - A… [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:37 am
Mitchell Daniels, Jr., et al (see ILB entry here), Niki Kelly of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette writes:The Family and Social Services Administration broke state law when it granted a no-bid $95â€â [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Terminated probationer denied a name-clearing hearingMatter of Johnston v Kelly, 35 A.D.3d 297, 828 N.Y.S.2d 10 Kevin Johnston, because he served as a probationary police officer, could be terminated from his position without a hearing or a statement of reasons, for any reason or no reason at all, provided the dismissal was not made in bad faith, was not for constitutionally impermissible reasons, or was not in violation of law. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:05 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court released its opinion in Potter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
The State relied upon cases upholding the use of RADAR, which was different than LIDAR. [read post]