Search for: "State v. Land" Results 381 - 400 of 13,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
State of Hawaii Dep't of Land and Natural Resources, No. 10-15645 (June 6, 2012), the case challenging the State's regulation of commercial weddings on state beaches under the First Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The Florida law bars entities, whether state owned or not, that are headquartered or incorporated under the laws of foreign adversaries from purchasing farmland or land near critical infrastructure. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:13 pm
Land O’Lakes has attempted to minimize the award as being “advisory,” stating the judge will have the final say.On a related note, the Minneapolis/St. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State of New York: New York Brief Shinnecock Opening Brief Shinnecock Reply Shinnecock v NY Opinion [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:06 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Aboriginal Land Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlState v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 10:17 am by Jeff Gittins
First, the Supreme Court noted that although the Conatser easement is certainly an interest in the land, such an interest in land may not qualify as a "land of the State" that is protected under the Utah Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:28 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
To begin a state specific search, choose the first letter of the state you would like to search:A C D F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V W Whether you are a government zoning official determining other city zoning regulations, a developer researching available land, or a concerned citizen investigating government issues, GovScan is here to help. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Shinnecock Cert Petition Questions presented: Petitioner’s case is the last in a long line of Indian land claim cases arising in the State of New York in which Indian tribes have been denied access to the courts by the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
The decisions so far On the first issue, the courts below were necessarily bound by the principle espoused by the House of Lords in R v Bancoult (no 2) [2009] 1 AC 453: that declarations of application attach not to the land which is contained in the territory of the signatory state, but instead to the ‘political entities’ about which the declaration is made; with the result that a declaration lapses whenever a ‘new political entity’ is formed. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Land Use Opinions Body: Below is a recent land use law Appellate Court opinion:   AC31956 - Boulanger v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether IGRA authorizes the approval of a compact that purports to allow for an online sports gambling monopoly throughout the state and off Indian lands. 2. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Amy Howe
In 1961, the state government acquired the cross and the land it sits on, due at least in part to concerns about safety as traffic around the cross increased. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:06 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court decision in Village of Euclid v. [read post]