Search for: "State v. Lessing" Results 381 - 400 of 38,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
English authority on the point was no different and in Harrison [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, a deportation case involving the application of Zambrano, Elias, Ward and Pitchford LJJ agreed with the Government that there is no basis for asserting that it is arguable that the Zambrano principle extends to cover anything less than a case where the EU citizen is forced to leave the territory of the EU. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 12:00 am
Lumen Mulligan (Michigan State) has posted on SSRN his essay, Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:32 am by Mark Sorkin
Wilson, citing at length their contention that the record-high level of incarceration in the United States has been beneficial. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offence, in order to convict the offender. eAdvocate Thought, if it takes several levels of state and federal courts, with qualified lawyers interpreting the law, to decide if a man is guilty, how can that reasonable man be expected to understand the law so that s/he does not violate the law? [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:56 am by Eric Goldman
First, she polled less than 1%–territory usually occupied by withdrawn or fringe candidates. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:07 pm by Tobin Admin
  The post Vehicles v Pedestrians appeared first on Tobin Injury Law. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:58 pm by Steven Calabresi
 Even Alexander Hamilton, himself, said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
A State's choice of a more restrictive search-and-seizure policy does not render less restrictive ones unreasonable, and hence unconstitutional. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:38 am
Thus, the issue of vagueness did not appear to have been raised, much less decided by the trial court, and Evans was precluded from raising it on appeal.Evans further contended that the trial court went too far in charting a corrective course for the jury as to the significance to attribute to the alleged void in the State's evidence. [read post]