Search for: "State v. Makee R."
Results 381 - 400
of 34,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 10:41 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:31 am
Published Decisions R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
The case of R v Butler held that material that is not obscene under this framework does not become so by reason of the person to whom it is shown, or the place of manner in which it is shown. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Michael R. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:50 am
Gunaratna v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The Grand Chamber relied upon the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in R v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis of 15 February 2017. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
R. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Ron DeSantis (R), whose state is one of the plaintiffs in the present case. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:46 am
The case of State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
" More recently, in C1.G v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am
R. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Kim, Tanya R. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
This post was drafted by Tracey R. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
She then instructed solicitors ho made further representations, including that it had been held that the benefits cap “indirectly discriminated against women over men” (citing the Supreme Court decision in R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21, [2019] 1 WLR 3289). [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
"] In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
A judge should probe such facts before making a decision on removal.[12] Importantly, the Supreme Court has explained that the evidentiary standard for the defendant may be higher in criminal cases of removal “because of the more compelling state interest in conducting criminal trials in the state court. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” Testa v. [read post]
