Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 381 - 400
of 21,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 2:04 am
& Shaw Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:08 am
" United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:48 am
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm
Nicholas KasterThe Trademark Trial and Appeal Board did not err when it found that the WU DANG TAI CHI GREEN TEA mark was confusingly similar to the registered mark TAI CHI, according to the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 am
Cosmetic Warriors Ltd., United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55325, 29 June 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
Slip Op. 09813 at *13-14, but, in doing so, specifically stated that it did not recognize the famous marks doctrine as an independent theory of liability under state law. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
In McCloskey v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
Winn involves a church-state challenge to Arizona's tuition tax credits (background), while Snyder v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
In M.C. and J.C. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am
In the introduction to his opinion, he comments critically on the state of thelaw. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:58 pm
Gonzalez Cause: Trademark Infringement, Counterfeiting, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution Court: District Court of Oregon Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
In Pequignot v Solo Cup Company (No. 2009-1547, Fed. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:37 pm
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
” Marks v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
