Search for: "State v. Mark Jones" Results 381 - 400 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
In the past, I have used Judge Jones as the lodestar of the Fifth Circuit's conservatism. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:17 am by Orin Kerr
Second, I will use the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:52 pm by Greg May
I never thought I’d get out-geeked on the subject of jurisdiction, and especially not on the subject of appellate jurisdiction, but I think Jones Day partner Mark Herrmann pulled it off today at his Drug & Device Law blog. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm
The father's behavior was marked by repeated complaints to CPS, verbal insults and accusations. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am by Kiran Bhat
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg has coverage of yesterday’s filings, as do Joan Biskupic of USA Today, James Vicini of Reuters, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Ashby Jones of the WSJ Law Blog, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, David G. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  At the same time though, there will be a new “high-water mark” of criminal enforcement. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 15 October 2024 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the data protection case of  Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm by Diversity Insight
Her application was reviewed by the Faculty Appointments Committee, which consisted of chairman Mark Janis, law school dean Carolyn Jones, and four faculty members. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
An article in the Washington Times focuses on Antoine Jones, the respondent in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘Successive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained without a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient justification”‘ (Maggio v 24 W 57 APF, LLC, 134 AD3d 621, 625 [1st Dept 2015], quoting Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409,409 [1st Dept 2010]; see also Pough v Aegis Prop. [read post]