Search for: "State v. Orange" Results 381 - 400 of 2,406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Orange (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 523, 532 [holding statute ran from filing of second NOD that corrected an information error – wrong project approval date – in first NOD]; Ventura Foothills Neighbors v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm by Florian Mueller
The government of the federal state of Bavaria has not imposed any additional corona-based restrictions since. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
On March 4, 2020, Advocate General Szpunar (“AG”) delivered his opinion in the case C-61/19 Orange România SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
Although only briefly in private practice, Weinstein did serve as a member of the legendary team of attorneys who worked on the appeal to the Supreme Court of Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
These lessons were learned painfully and too late to help the plaintiff in Behrend v New Windsor Group, LLC, in which an appellate court last month affirmed dismissal of the putative assignee’s lawsuit claiming a 50% membership interest in an LLC that owns a shopping center in Orange County, New York, allegedly acquired by assignment from someone who, as it turned out, held a contingent interest that never ripened into membership. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:12 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:19 am
As a reminder, ATR was potentially on the hook for (i) the press release; and (ii) aircraft branding.Unlike easyfly, ATR is domiciled in the EU and, therefore, under Article 125 EUTMR easyGroup had the choice of suing ATR in its Member State of domicile (France) or in the Member State in which the act of infringement occurred (Article 125(5)). [read post]