Search for: "State v. Pari" Results 381 - 400 of 1,453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2019, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Deadline to submit abstract: December 1, 2019 IndiaShirin R.K. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of… [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm by Kevin Kaufman
First, the proposal states that “consumer-facing” businesses are the focus. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 12:54 pm by Rui Dias
Simon Taylor (University of Paris Nanterre) ensued directing the discussion to the private enforcement of the GDPR, giving note of some recent case law in the UK on non-pecuniary losses (one of which from the day previous to the Conference, Lloyd v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
Contents include:Hans Corell, UN Security Council Reform—The Council Must Lead by Example Michael Wood, Lessons from the ILC’s Work on ‘Immunity of State Officials’: Melland Schill Lecture, 21 November 2017 Mohit Khubchandani, The United States and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change Andrea Carcano, On the Governance of International Judicial Institutions: The Development of Performance Indicators for the International Criminal Court Carolin Mai… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
The Cour d’Appel de Paris found the defendant liable and awarded relief to the plaintiffs prohibiting the defendants from using the photographs subject to an astreinte (a French injunction tool). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
For example, if Brexit happens, London Fashion Week, the 2019 edition of which just concluded, might lose shows to Paris or Milan.Counsel for BHTB raised an interesting point: is the “Fortress Europe” approach that an ‘EU disclosure only’ approach to qualification for UCD protection consistent with the requirement under Article 3 of TRIPS that signatory states do not treat their own nationals any more favourably than nationals of another signatory… [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Ben
In 2012 the court in Paris ruled that Alan Wofsy, had violated a previous order against making any commercial use of the photos, and ordered him to pay damages to the copyright-holder. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm by Scott Birkey and R. Clark Morrison
Other notable revisions to the concept of critical habitat include changes that address the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am by Lovechilde
  We strongly oppose efforts by Republican lawmakers at the state and federal level to undermine Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am by Lovechilde
  We strongly oppose efforts by Republican lawmakers at the state and federal level to undermine Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Arshan Barzani
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:58 am
Grover, Collective Reparations as a Partial Remedy for State-Perpetrated Blanket Violations of the Rights of Targeted Child Asylum Seeker Groups [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]