Search for: "State v. Rivera" Results 381 - 400 of 713
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Susan Brenner
As the Court of Appeals noted, United States Secret Service Agent William Slavoski filed a civil rights complaint (pursuant to 42 U.S.Code § 1983) against employees of the Pennsylvania State Police (`PSP’), including Commissioner Frank Pawlowski, Mervin Rodriguez, John Rice, Francis Hacken, Bryon Devlin, Willard Oliphant, Huascar Rivera, and Pedro Rivera (collectively `Defendants’). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
The Court finds that this complaint is also without grounds since there is an adequate number of precedent cases to reflect that , “"'[a]n indictment charging a defendant as a principal is not unlawfully amended by the admission of proof and instruction to the jury that a defendant is additionally charged with acting-in-concert to commit the same crime'" (People v Robinson, 53 AD3d 681, 683-684 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 794 [2008], quoting People v… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Fortunately for the State, the Supreme Court in 2011 decided Cavazos v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:56 am by Steve Statsinger
But, following its own decision in Rivera, the court held that the new version of 1B1.10 does not apply retroactively.In United States v Murph, No. 10-1555-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:20 am
Banki (reach of a regulatory crime narrowed under the rule of lenity); United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:28 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“As part of the nation’s health care system, Medicare serves vulnerable populations,” said United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:07 am by Bill Raftery
  State Bill Form of removal Target Reason for removal request Status Iowa HR 47 Impeachment Supreme Court Justice Brent Appel Same sex marriage decision Varnum v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]