Search for: "State v. Rome" Results 381 - 400 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am by Veronika Gaertner
 Jan von Hein: “The applicability of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-Regulation to damages caused by multiple tortfeasors”  In Melzer v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:27 am
The sources have to be applied in the specific order of precedence stated by Art. 3 EGBGB: (1.) [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Qisheng He, The EU Conflict of Laws Communitarization and the Modernization of Chinese Private International Law, pp. 47-85 Abstract: Since 2007 the EU has adopted the Rome I, Rome II and Rome III Council Regulations codifying and unifying the respective conflict of laws rules in contract, tort and divorce and legal separation. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
Eventually, they brought their new ideas back to Rome and transformed Catholicism worldwide, so that the Church itself now espouses religious toleration. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:02 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
He arrived wearing a black hooded cape and mask of a type featured in a British film about a pro-democracy activist of the near-future, V For Vendetta. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The official announcement reads as follows: The current volume of the “Yearbook of Private International Law” includes three special sections: The first one is devoted to the recent European developments in the area of family law like the proposal on the matrimonial property régimes in its relation with other EU instruments, such as Brussels IIbis or Rome III. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am by Thomas Margoni
In this decision the court of Rome states that, in accordance with the e-Commerce directive (implemented by leg. decree 70/2003), the Enforcement directive (implemented by leg. decree 140/2006), and the ECJ decision C-70/10 of November 2011, a hosting provider cannot be held liable for the hosted content. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am by Xandra Kramer
Cornelis A. de Visser, The law governing the voluntary assignment of claims under the Rome I Regulation, p. 461-467. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), for example, does not address violations of the principle of precautions in attack. [read post]