Search for: "State v. Ruth"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Public.Resource.Org that dealt with eligibility of copyright protection, stating that the non-authoritative status of annotations indicated that the creation of the annotations would fall outside of legislative duties.And even more recently, she authored the long-awaited decision regarding the "Booking.com" service mark, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:53 pm
While still a practicing lawyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1973 argued to 9 men on the United States Supreme Court in a historically significant case, Frontiero v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:53 pm
She further entrenched and extended these successes with her jurisprudence on the Supreme Court, most notably in her important opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Although Ruth Ginsburg had completed two years at Harvard, her degree would come from Columbia, where she graduated at the top of her class. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
In 1996, she wrote the decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
United States, the next year’s United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:10 am
In the 2014 case of Veasey v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:05 am
At the Brennan Center, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy examines how political donations in state attorney general elections may be influencing some of the Republican attorneys general who are suing to dismantle the Affordable Care Act in California v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
James School v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
This term, in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
As in Bostock, the dissenters (this time Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg) did not seem to disagree about many of the key religious liberty points. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
With three more votes, your state could choose whatever religion it wants. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
The plurality, which also included Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, determined that the law created an unconstitutional “undue burden” on access to abortion services, failing to satisfy the standard established in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
In another essay for the series, Amelia Burnette explores United States Forest Service v. [read post]
