Search for: "State v. STEVEN R." Results 381 - 400 of 2,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:29 am by Staci Zaretsky
* What will happen if SCOTUS were to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm by FM Librarian
[text via NBER]- See also two earlier related papers posted in July 2016 and August 2016.Pereira v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It would even be open to liberal red-state supreme courts to find a state constitutional right to abortion, at least pending recall or reversal by the voters.But now suppose the Supreme Court were to overrule Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:33 am
Peter Marcus Kristensen, International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy Joshua Tschantret, Cleansing the Caliphate: Insurgent Violence against Sexual Minorities Ore Koren & Anoop K Sarbahi, State Capacity, Insurgency, and Civil War: A Disaggregated Analysis Christopher McIntosh & Ian Storey, Between Acquisition and Use: Assessing the Likelihood of Nuclear Terrorism Charles Crabtree, Holger L Kern, & Steven Pfaff, Mass Media and the Diffusion of… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Roe survived after Justice Kennedy joined Justices O’Connor, Blackmun, Stevens, and Souter in keeping Roe alive, but modified, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Less broadly, Justice John Paul Stevens infamously “failed the First Amendment” with his dissenting 1989 vote that would have allowed governments to ban flag burning, a view that he did not change in subsequent years.The point is that finding exceptions to rules does not mean that there are no rules. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]