Search for: "State v. Shorter"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 10:13 am
Talent agencies licensed by the State of California have a statutory monopoly over the procurement of employment in the entertainment industry. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
If you text the word invite, I‑N‑V‑I‑T‑E, we’ll know about that. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
See State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Horvath v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm
State Bank of India Staff Association (29.08.2005- SC): MANU/SC/0516/2005, Para 8]. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
” Conspicuously absent from this portion of the opinion’s discussion is any mention of the legislative intent underlying the 90-day filing and service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1), its plain language stating it applies to bar “all persons” from “any further action or proceeding” after it expires (§ 65009(e)), and its expressly stated intent not to displace shorter statutes of limitations. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The Law Students Society of Ontario (the “LSSO”) recently surveyed Ontario law students to better understand the debt load experienced by them and its effect on them. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
Federal Judge Rules That Expert Testimony is Required to Assert That Smoking Impacts Life Expectancy
20 Feb 2019, 3:00 am
Hornak of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:46 am
V. in Berlin), respectively. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:21 am
While some states (e.g. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
For instance, in Qualcomm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” ODonnell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:35 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 5:53 am
Further, there is no evidence from the council to show that a shorter period than ten years would undermine their stated objectives” ([59]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
(“Cass”) and Drummond v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:24 pm
Brasher v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 7:47 am
At least one result was the decision two years ago in Tyson Foods v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:50 pm
§ 3553(f)(1)–(5); US v. [read post]
