Search for: "State v. Slotness" Results 381 - 400 of 431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
And I'm asking the Attorney General and relevant state -- relevant agencies to work with state attorneys general to monitor for price gouging to make sure that nobody is taking advantage of working families at the pump. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Attempts to give certainty—but sometimes what you think is a clear definition becomes more complex, as in Apple v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Commercial speech v. speaker—corporate entity v. person. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm by Vikram Raghavan
 India has had its fair share of representatives at the ICJ; being one of twelve states with three of more judges at the Peace Palace. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm by uwlegalscholarship
The current plan is to have one day during the Annual Meeting with three one hour time slots assigned to poster presentations. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am by Valerio De Stefano
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
”[33] The confusing aspects of the UIEGA, due to conflicting State and Federal law, and the proposed legislation which would permit internet poker, mean that the legal battle over internet gambling has yet to play out. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Second, the Court has shown no inclination to overrule outright the most recent ruling allowing the use of race in college admissions — its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (12), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier is terminated, revoked or otherwise barred from participation in a State Medicaid program or any other Federal health care program. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier is terminated, revoked or otherwise barred from participation in a State Medicaid program or any other Federal health care program. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]