Search for: "State v. Stevens " Results 381 - 400 of 4,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
  It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:48 pm by Andrew Langille
Steven Greenhouse, the New York Times labour reporter, wrote a good article on the decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Kiera Flynn
This week a Michigan state court relied on this Term’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:54 am by Mark Tabakman
In a recent posting in the MS & K Employment Alert, Steven Schneider and Ivan Perkins wrote about the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-876, Black v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Polaris Indus., 49 F.4th 1308 (9th Cir. 2022) (decided Sept. 29, 2022) (affirmed dismissal of UCL claim with directions to dismiss without prejudice to re-filing in state court) The above case summaries are by panelist Steven Swaney. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
[Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZS.html]Justice STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court.California is one of at least nine States that authorize the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Capps, Incidental Burdens on First Amendment Freedoms, (Forthcoming, Notre Dame Law Review Reflection, Vol. 96, No. -- , 2021).Steven A. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:31 am by tracey
High Court (Administrative Court) MK & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWHC 1896 (Admin) (10 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Wood & Anor v Mistry [2012] EWHC 1899 (Ch) (10 July 2012) BXL Services, Re [2012] EWHC 1877 (Ch) (10 July 2012)   JSC BTA Bank v Solodchenko & Ors [2012] EWHC 1891 (Ch) (10 July 2012)   Stevens v Hamed [2012] EWHC 1871 (Ch) (6 July 2012)… [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 The point arises again in Idenix v Gilead and was the subject of some obiter comments by Kitchin LJ. [read post]