Search for: "State v. Stock"
Results 381 - 400
of 6,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2018, 8:31 am
The Company launched its initial offer in March 2014, and as of the second quarter of 2018, had raised $434 million in investor equity through the issuance of common stock. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:14 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
United States last weak in which McCutchen challenged the federal ban on gun bump stocks. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
So, where do we even begin with Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the antitrust laws do not apply to the process of selling new stocks after their initial offering on stock markets. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stock, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1862 (08 August 2008) Freeman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1863 (08 August 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sony Computer Entertainment UK Ltd v Cinram Logistics UK Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 955 (08 August 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Collett v Smith & Anor [2008] EWHC 1962 (QB) (11 August 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:51 am
Supreme Court denying certiorari in Whitman v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:08 pm
Reversing the determination that a New Jersey law repealing prohibitions on sports gambling violated the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, making it unlawful for a State or its subdivisions to sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize betting on sports because by permitting sports betting the State was authorizing sports betting under the statute as PASPA was held to violate the anticommandeering rule stating that Congress cannot… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
In Mathers v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:36 pm
In Craig and Craig v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 11:25 am
In Guarino v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
In an interesting decision, OBX-Stock, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
As I mentioned in a prior blog, in Coulter v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
In Belmont v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 5:46 am
It made no sense to the court that the shareholder would sell his shares in reliance on statements about himself that he knew were false (Salvani v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
Contrary to petitioners' contention, however, the petition fails to state a cause of action for fraud or constructive fraud against either HSBC or respondent law firm because it fails to make a "factually supported allegation" of misrepresentation (Pope v Saget, 29 AD3d 437, 441, lv denied 8 NY3d 803; see Simmons v Washing Equip. [read post]
