Search for: "State v. Suit"
Results 381 - 400
of 36,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
They teamed up with the Augusta Free Press to sue for access to the recordings, a suit they won last month. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Certainly it subjects its approach to questions of bias (negative) or political instrumentalism (neutral or to expected from a state organ). [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:37 pm
Texas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm
It is also broadly consistent with the Supreme Court's June 2023 8-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:05 am
Suit was filed earlier this week in a Virgina state trial court by a high school student challenging Fairfax County School Board regulations (full text) that support transgender students. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
And there are other pressures toward abstraction that apply in other cases, such as state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
” Notably, in Authors Guild v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:47 pm
The district court dismissed the suit for a variety of reasons, including lack of Article III standing and failure to state a claim. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:53 am
This standard changed in the 2011 decision in Mack v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:45 am
” Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Indeed, Griffin’s Case was about a state office, and the Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The decision in Murray v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:45 pm
United v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm
“This suit was brought by Colorado voters under state law in state court. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]