Search for: "State v. Trader" Results 381 - 400 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Foreign Exchange Trader's Fraudulent Inducement Claim Against JP Morgan Chase Bank Dismissed Herzfeld v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Adelphia Defendants Denied New Trial; Claim That Chief Witness' Testimony Was Perjured Is Rejected United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:13 am
Scherer, respondents NEW YORK COUNTY Alternative Dispute Resolution Court Upholds, Confirms Arbitration Panel's $77 Million Award Against Security Traders 212 Investment Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:48 am by Eliana Baer
This can been seen from the Appellate Division’s February decision in the case of Wonderlin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:23 pm
It is for Member States' courts to determine whether orders are not 'ordinary', i.e. if they are out of proportion to the needs of that Member State's market. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
" These concerns were prompted by a ruling from a California District Court on August 13, 2010 in Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 5:36 am by Simon Lester
" This appears to be addressed to the criticisms that some had of the NAFTA award in Cargill v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:22 am by Milen Hristov
The simplest test to see if you can trade with such antiques is to check their visible age and type.However if you are collector and owner/trader of cultural heritage antiques, there are special rules for trading set in Chapter V of the Act.Trading with Bulgarian antiques, classified as ‘cultural heritage’If you want to trade with Bulgarian antiques classified as ‘cultural heritage’, you have to register yourself with the Ministry of Culture. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Citing Mark Foy's Limited v Davies Coop and Company Limited (1956) 95 CLR 190 - "The public...are being invited to purchase goods of the defendant which are to be distinguished from the goods of other traders partly because they are described as "Tub Happy" goods. [read post]