Search for: "State v. Tri-State Pharmaceutical"
Results 381 - 400
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
It stated all the dosages correctly as well as the consequences of overdose. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Amgen v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 1:16 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 1:35 pm
Kreppein v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm
Bayer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:25 pm
Bayer Schering Pharma v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
Merrrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U .S. 579 (1993). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
App. 1979); Ortho Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione… [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
A Barr Pharmaceuticals hyperactivity-drug case is to be tried in August in federal court in Tallahassee, Florida. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Moyer v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:48 am
He served as counsel in the State of California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:47 pm
Sanofi-Synthelabo v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Supreme Court on exclusive marketing rights: (Spicy IP), Japan: First induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell patent at Kyoto University: (Competitive Info), Slovenia: Supplementary protection certificates in Slovenia: (The SPC Blog), United States: Biotech/pharma lobbying scoreboard – second quarter update – part II: (Patent Docs), United States: Ferring Pharmaceuticals argues to bring down direct purchaser suits: (Law 360), United… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
They had tried that in Maryland and lost, in a case called Dehn v. [read post]
