Search for: "State v. Wales" Results 381 - 400 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS QC
Baroness Hale specifically alerted at [35] to the very real problem of discrimination against gay people before stating that this was not happened in the present case. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In proceedings by prisoners subsequently heard in Scotland (Smith v Scott [2007] SC 345), Northern Ireland (R v Secretary of State ex parte Toner and Walsh [1997] NIQB 18) and in England and Wales (Chester v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 1439)  the relevant Secretary of State has expressly accepted that the ban on prisoner voting is incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:56 am by Miquel Montañá
In 2008, the House of Lords (as then called) of England and Wales, in the Conor Medsystems Inc v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am by Rose Hughes
Particularly, the agreement between GW and Otsuka stated that it was governed by New York Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael
The California-based company was part of the Tamiz v Google Inc 2013 case in England and Wales. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:27 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
In Ponticelli UK Ltd v Gallagher, the Inner House of the Court of Session held that employee share incentive plans, even if explicitly stated to be non-contractual (and not referred to in the employment contract) arise “in connection with” the employee’s employment. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Their only means of redress would be to bring proceedings in the EU state in which at least one of the defendants is domiciled. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Michael Peacock was unanimously acquitted, after a four-day trial that saw the outdated obscenity law of England and Wales in the dock. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
But no UK patent ruling has ever been even remotely as controversial as Justice Colin Birss's 2017 holding in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:05 am by Emma Kent
The Crime Survey for England and Wales estimated that in the 12 months preceding March 2020, 5.5% of adults aged 16 to 74 years old experienced domestic abuse – that works out at 2.3 million people. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:13 pm by Joseph Jones
Skelton to have been acting “in the course of employment”, adopting a broad interpretation of the scope of employment (consistent with past case law: Bazely v Curry [1999 174 D.L.R. 4th 45], Lister [2001 UKHL 22] and Mohamud [2016 UKSC 11]). [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:32 am by Hollis Kelly
Tugushev v (1) Orlov, (2) Roth, (3) Petric [2019] EWHC 645 (Comm) is a case which forms part of a bitter and high-profile battle between two Russian businessmen, the Claimant, Alexander Tugushev, and the First Defendant, Vitaly Orlov, alongside two of Mr Orlov’s associates, in relation to the Norebo Group, which is a corporate group which operates an international fishing business largely under Russian state fishing quotas. [read post]