Search for: "State v. Wisdom" Results 381 - 400 of 2,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Putting governments’ actions into words, government spending is guided by the political wisdom that states: “there are no votes in justice,” i.e., there are no significant quantities of votes to be gained by spending significant quantities of taxpayers’ money on the justice system. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:24 am by Danielle D'Onfro
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in City of Chicago v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, in defiance of the reigning (or even raining if not pouring) conventional wisdom, the main political obstacle to electoral reform has not come from the smallest states. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
How could I resist the temptation of addressing the legal issues posed by the Tweets of a “very stable genius” with “great and unmatched wisdom” who is the most powerful person in the world? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:31 am by Ilya Somin
The conventional wisdom about 1876 holds that such acceptance as Hayes did achieve was in large part bought at the price of the "Compromise of 1877," in which Republicans agreed to ease up on pressuring the southern states to protect the civil and voting rights of African-Americans, in exchange for Democratic acquiescence to Hayes' win. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Before being appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court, Justice Bolick had been one of the leading libertarian lawyers in the country (he cofounded the Institute for Justice); this is from his opinion today in State v. [read post]