Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
DiazDocket: 10-1264Issue(s): (1) Whether it is necessarily unreasonable under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Strickland in Ohio has granted a commutation to Sidney Cornwell, which means, save for the Baze v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
So the United States Supreme Court says, Yes, there was IAC here. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Biden, 22-1225Issues: (1) Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
United States, 19-6062. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
United States, 16-1320. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Strickland Issue: Whether a racial minority group that constitutes less than 50% of a proposed district's population can state a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
