Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2010, 2:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:48 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964). [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
The action arose from a program originally broadcast on August 15, 2004 (episode), Ali G interviewed Gore Vidal (Vidal) regarding the United States Constitution and Amendments thereto. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
Thus, the Court concluded, Padilla’s circumstances fell within the scope of Sixth Amendment protection and were subject to analysis under the test established in Strickland v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
See, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Maryland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:05 pm
On Wednesday, March 31, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:55 am
INS v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Weekly D342aContracts -- Home construction -- Retention of purchase deposit after buyer cancelled due to delay that was neither party's fault -- Consumer law -- Section 501.1375, which requires a building contractor or developer to hold certain deposits of a prospective buyer of a one- or two-family residential dwelling unit in an escrow account unless the buyer waives the escrow requirements in writing, does not apply to general contractor who contracts to build single-family… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:36 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
United States Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
As the court explained in Arellano v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
United States, the Court rejected the idea that police were required to obtain clarification about ambiguous requests for counsel before continuing their questioning. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
United States, No. 09-989. [read post]
