Search for: "Supreme Court Judges"
Results 381 - 400
of 94,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
These attacks on bodily autonomy, coupled with two major abortion cases currently before the Supreme Court, signal that the policy and legal landscape will continue to shift. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:59 am
Spirt v Spirt 2024 NY Slip Op 31873(U) May 22, 2024 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 160271/2023 Judge: Gerald Lebovits is not a legal malpractice case. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
Israel is phasing out its use of a desert detention camp, a state attorney told Israel’s Supreme Court today during the first-ever hearing about the facility. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Prosecutor Who Quietly Pursued a Risky Path” by Shayna Jacobs (Washington Post) for MSN Ohio: “FirstEnergy, the Center Point of a Bribery Plot, Could Officially Beat the Rap This Summer” by Jake Zuckerman (Cleveland Plain Dealer) for MSN Redistricting Arkansas: “U.S.Supreme Court Sends Arkansas Redistricting Case Back to Judges after South Carolina Ruling” by Andew DeMillo (Associated Press) for Yahoo News The post… [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:59 am
While Hunter could always throw in the towel before the start of testimony, there is currently no discernible strategy beyond hoping that a pending case in the Supreme Court might undermine the indictment. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
The Eighth Circuit is a fairly conservative court; only one of the eleven judges in active service (and none of the active senior circuit judges) was appointed by a Democratic president. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
The FCC is highly likely to reject the petition for a stay, but the groups can then ask appeals court judges to impose an injunction that would prevent enforcement. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
The Georgia Supreme Court recently clarified that “the ‘use’ of a motor vehicle as provided in O.C.G.A. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
One judge dissented, hung up on the distinction between quality and identity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
The Supreme Court’s Second Amendment is a chronological chameleon. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
The Supreme Court’s Second Amendment is a chronological chameleon. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Certain Supreme Court briefs filed by the federal government during the Great Depression reflected Stern's research and thinking. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
They should be viewed in an objective way and the meaning attributed to the words should be that which a reasonable person would give them” The Supreme Court in R v Narwal, 2013 BCSC 340 further identified factors that the court considered when determining whether an utterance will constitute to a threat for the purposes of s.234.1 of the Criminal Code: The actual words spoken; The circumstances in which the words were uttered; The manner in which they were spoken;… [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
On August 25, 2023—only one week after Judge Cantú Hexsel blocked S.B. 14—Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed an accelerated appeal to the Texas Supreme Court seeking to overturn Judge Cantú Hexsel’s decision. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
On August 25, 2023—only one week after Judge Cantú Hexsel blocked S.B. 14—Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed an accelerated appeal to the Texas Supreme Court seeking to overturn Judge Cantú Hexsel’s decision. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:30 am
As the Supreme Court has explained, “The powers of the federal judiciary will be adequate for the great burdens placed upon them only if they are employed prudently, with recognition of the strengths as well as the hazards that go with our kind of representative government. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court twice in recent decades. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
” On April 23, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Although the Supreme Court has opined on what zealous advocacy means, the Court has set a very low bar for the kind of representation defense counsel is constitutionally required to provide—a bar far lower than zealousness.The Supreme Court discussed zealous advocacy in McCoy v. [read post]
