Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor" Results 381 - 400 of 1,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
He rightly believes that Big Brother shouldn't be monitoring our phone calls but yet somehow believes the state has a right to interfere in a woman's decision to end a pregnancy. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:56 am by Dave Maass
Box that is monitored by the California Secretary of State's office and a program identification card. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:19 pm
Maynard, in which the court held that police must adhere to Fourth Amendment "reasonable search" requirements when using a GPS device to monitor the location of a target's vehicle 24/7 for a month. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:01 pm
But regardless whether the Supreme Court grants cert in Skilling's appeal, the Court's decision to hear Black's appeal is very good news for Skilling. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm by Mitchell Silverman
Supreme Court: “The central issue in this case is whether the people of the District of Columbia will be able to exercise their constitutional right to vote on this important issue, just as voters in 31 states have been able to do. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:08 am by Drew Boortz
  In holding that such monitoring did not violate the 4th Amendment, the Supreme Court distinguished the Katz ruling by finding that, unlike telephone booths, people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their movements in public areas. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:52 am by Eric
[Note: unlike Google's detailed trademark policy, Google's policy towards personal names is murky. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 4:21 am
"The Supreme Court may end up telling them, 'Look, just change the drug cocktail so that you can execute people without this potential problem'," said Supreme Court lawyer Thomas Goldstein. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:02 am
Cruz's attorney's request that the Center's Language Liaison pair Ms. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:02 am by corynne mcsherry
Just over 30 years ago, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Sony v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:28 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
I have always believed that the Supreme Courts decision in Dudenhoeffer was a fine piece of line drawing in this regard, allowing such claims in a narrow class of circumstances but limiting them to a degree sufficient to maintain a firm distinction between securities law and ERISA’s fiduciary standards. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Do you think the Supreme Court would have agreed? [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 1:00 am by Christian Romero
One is the protecting data that's on the phone, people's contacts, stuff like that. [read post]