Search for: "Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The hearing officer rejected the application on the ground that the machine contravened the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy can be neither created nor destroyed. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
The list focuses on, among other general requirements, the need to “develop and maintain secure systems and applications,” and the need to “track and monitor all access to network resources and [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Int’l v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am
For example, the Framework allows for the creation of several types of Profiles: Profiles that provide strategic enterprise views of a cybersecurity program, Profiles that are focused on a specific business unit and its security, or Profiles that describe technologies and processes used to protect a particular system. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:52 pm
Ariad Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
The court also rejected 3Taps’ attempt to invoke the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
United States, 714 F.3d 1311, 1315 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am
The long-awaited decision by the United States Supreme Court on business method patents was issued on June 19, 2014. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
INS v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:22 am
15 U.S.C. section 1127; Central Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Cos. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:12 am
United Artists Television, Inc., and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
The BOLO listings were either a lazy or targeted response (depending on who you talk to) to the significant uptick in tax exempt applications following the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
We therefore affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Id. at *1. [read post]
